Scenes of recognition and formation of gifted Young people in Rionegro, Colombia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
(analytical)
Giftedness is understood from a pedagogical perspective and understanding of this concept is achieved through hermeneutical work with three young people. This study identifies the voices of the young people who carry this adjective in our country and have not been heard, understood and represented. The authors construct theatrical scenes in which the psychometric examination is presented as a recognition ritual, along with other technologies to produce differences in the school contexts that make up the weird 􃲗 normal relationship as binomial. The study identifies that giftedness is an unviable identity in the context through conducting cryptic processes. Finally, the authors find a struggle for recognition based on identifying talent through mutual recognition. This would make the existence of people with giftedness viable without being diluted.
Keywords: Recognition, gifted, hermeneutics, identity.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial - You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
ShareAlike - If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Barrios, L. A., Vega, R., & Vuyk, A. (2020). Historias de vida de estudiantes con altas capacidades en Paraguay: participantes de un programa especializado en matemáticas. Eureka, 17(1), 96-111.
Betancur, M. C. (2017). Narración, juegos del lenguaje e identidades: aproximaciones desde la filosofía de Paul Ricoeur. Universidad Veracruzana.
Borland, J. H. (2003). Rethinking gifted education. Teachers College Press. Butler, J. (1997). The excitable speech. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2008). Deshacer el género. Paidós. Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? Routledge.
Butler, J. (2017). Cuerpos aliados y lucha política: hacia una teoría política de la asamblea. Paidós.
Carbee, K. A. (2020). Future problem solvers leadership and self-identity examined: An interpretative phenomenological analysis [Tesis de doctorado]. American College of Education.
Coleman, L. J. (1985). Schooling the gifted. Addison-Wesley.
Coleman, L. J., Micko, K. J., & Cross, T. L. (2015). Twenty-five years of research on the lived experience of being gifted in school: Capturing the students' voices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(4), 358-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215607322
Dai, D. Y. (2018). A history of giftedness: Paradigms and paradoxes. En S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 1-14). Springer. https://doi.org/gq3j
Davis, J. L., Ford, D. Y., Moore, J. L., & Floyd, E. F. (2020). Black, gifted, and living in the country: Searching for equity and excellence in rural gifted education programs. En C. R. Chambers, & L. Crumb (Eds.), African American rural education (advances in race and ethnicity in education) (pp. 39-52). https://doi.org/gq3k
Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. The Free Press. Ford, D. Y., Scott, M. T., Moore, J. L., & Amos, S. O. (2013). Gifted education and cultura-lly different students. Gifted Child Today, 36(3), 205-208. https://doi.org/gq3p
Foucault, M. (1999). Estética, ética y hermenéutica. Paidós. Gagné, F. (2010). Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 21(2), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2010.525341
Gallardo-Cerón, B. N. (2018). Ser semillerista en red: rutas histórico-administrativas de la Fundación RedColsi. Fondo Editorial Universidad Católica de Oriente.
Gallardo-Cerón, B. N. (2020). Proyecto Hábitat: comunidad ética, política y creativa en Rionegro, Antioquia. En S. López de Maturana (Ed.), Educándo(nos) con las comunidades (pp. 32-44). Nueva Mirada.
García-Cepero, M. C., & Proestakis-Maturana, A. N. (2010). Perspectivas de atención a los estudiantes con talento académico: una visión global. En Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo de Talento DeLta-UCN (Ed.), Talentos en el Bicentenario: educación para el desarrollo de estudiantes sobresalientes (pp. 37-46). Universidad Católica del Norte.
Glaeser, C. (2003). Why be normal? The search for identity and acceptance in the gifted adolescent. English Journal, 92(4), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3650454
Grantham, T., & Ford, D. Y. (2003). Beyond self-concept and self-esteem: Racial identity and gifted African American students. The High School Journal, 87(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2003.0016
Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia. (2015). Documento de orientaciones técnicas, administrativas y pedagógicas para la atención educativa a estudiantes con capacidades y/o talentos excepcionales en el marco de la educación inclusiva. Autor.
Mónks, F. J. (1996). Herencia y ambiente: una aproximación interactiva hacia el talento. Revista de Psicología, 14(2), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.199602.001
Piñeres-Sus, J. D. (2017). Lo humano como ideal regulativo. Imaginación antropológica: cultura, formación y antropología negativa. Fondo Editorial Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1vjqqqs
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184.
Renzulli, J. S., & Gaesser, A. H. (2015). Sistema multi-criterio para la identificación de las altas capacidades creativas/productivas y de alto logro. Revista de Educación, (368), 92-121. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-290
Ricoeur, P. (2003). El conflicto de las interpretaciones: ensayos sobre hermenéutica. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Ricoeur, P. (2004). Tiempo y narración I: configuración del tiempo en el relato histórico. Siglo XXI.
Ricoeur, P. (2005). Caminos de reconocimiento: tres estudios. Trotta.
Ricoeur, P. (2010). Del texto a la acción: ensayos sobre hermenéutica II. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Runge-Peña, A. K., Hincapié-García, A., Muñoz-Gaviria, D. A., & Ospina-Cruz, C. (2020). El campo disciplinar y profesional de la pedagogía en Colombia. Fondo Editorial Universidad Católica de Oriente.
Sáenz-Obregón, J., Saldarriaga, O., & Ospina, A. (1997). Mirar la infancia: pedagogía, moral y modernidad en Colombia, 1903-1946. Foro Nacional por Colombia.
Sáenz-Obregón, J., & Zuluaga, O. L. (2004). Las relaciones entre psicología y pedagogía: infancia y prácticas de examen. Memoria y Sociedad, 8(17), 9-26.
Schrag, K. (2019). The lived experiences of gifted students in mainstream classroms: A phenome-nological study [Tesis de doctorado]. Capella University.
Smeeks, T. J. (2020). Opportunity gap: Rural gifted left behind [Tesis de doctorado]. Appala-chian State University.
Stern, W. (1912). The psychological methods of testing intelligence. Baltimore, Warwick & York.
Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Explorations in giftedness. Cambridge University Press.
Szymansky, A. (2021). High expectations, limited options: How gifted students living in poverty approach the demands of AP coursework. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211001443
Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence. An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon intelli-gence scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(2), 111-116.
Tourón, J. (2020). Las altas capacidades en el sistema educativo español: reflexiones sobre el concepto y la identificación. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 38(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.396781
Whiting, G. (2006). Enhancing culturally diverse males' scholar identity: Suggestions for educators of gifted students. Summer, 29(3), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2006-2
Whiting, G. (2009). Gifted black males: Understanding and decreasing barriers to achieve-ment and identity. Roeper Review, 31(4), 224-233. https://doi.org/c3dzp3
Yarza, A. (2010). Del destierro, el encierro y el aislamiento a la educación y la pedagogía de anormales en Bogotá y Antioquia. Principios del siglo XIX y mediados del siglo XX. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, 22(57), 111-129.
Ziegler, A. (2005). The actiotope model of giftedness. En R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (411-436). https://doi.org/fw7nf2
Ziegler, A., & Phillipson, S. N. (2012). Towards a systemic theory of gifted education. High Ability Studies, 23(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2012.679085
Zubiría, J. de (2019, 15 de julio). ¿Existen los niños superdotados? Semana. https://bit.ly/2VJZHQB