Relación docente-estudiante y compromiso escolar: percepción de estudiantes secundarios con necesidades educativas especiales
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
(analítico)
Investigaciones previas sostienen que la relación docente-estudiante es un factor relevante para el compromiso escolar y rendimiento académico. Sin embargo, su impacto ha sido poco explorado en estudiantes con necesidades educativas especiales. Este estudio examina la influencia de la relación docente-estudiante en el compromiso escolar según la percepción de estudiantes de primer año medio con necesidades educativas especiales de una Región de Chile. Se realizó un estudio cualitativo, de tipo fenomenológico y de alcance descriptivoanalítico. Se desarrollaron diez entrevistas en profundidad a estudiantes con necesidades educativas especiales, las que se analizaron mediante el método de comparación constante de la teoría fundamentada. Los resultados revelan el rol clave de los/as docentes en el compromiso escolar a través de la satisfacción de las necesidades de vinculación y competencia de sus estudiantes, pero no de su autonomía.
Palabras clave: Compromiso escolar, necesidades educativas especiales, relación profesor-estudiante, educación secundaria.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
- La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia
Bajo los siguientes términos:
-
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
-
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
-
CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la lamisma licencia del original.
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otras a hacer cualquier uso permitido por la licencia.
Citas
Alley, K. M. (2019). Fostering middle school students’ autonomy to support motivation and engagement. Middle School Journal, 50(3), 5-14. https://doi.org/g6ss
Archambault, I., Vandenbossche-Makombo, J. & Fraser, S. L. (2017). Students’ oppositional behaviors and engagement in school: The differential role of the student-teacher relationship. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(6), 1702-1712. https://doi.org/f99fz8
Ben-Yehuda, S., Leyser, Y., & Last, U. (2009). Teacher educational beliefs and sociometric status of special educational needs (SEN) students in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/btszv7
Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., & Webster, R. (2009). The effect of support staff on pupil engagement and individual attention. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 661-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902878917
Burns, E., Martin, A., & Collie, R. (2018). Adaptability, personal best (PB) goals setting, and gains in students’ academic outcomes: A longitudinal examination from a social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.02.001
Canales, M. (2006). Metodologías de investigación social. LOM.
Carter, E., Sisco, L., Brown, L., Brickham, D., & Al-Khabbaz, Z. (2008). Peer interactions and academic engagement of youth with developmental disabilities in inclusive middle and high school classrooms. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113(6), 479-494. https://doi.org/10.1352/2008.113:479-494
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.), (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. En M. Gunnar, & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology (pp. 43-77). The University of Chicago.
Cortiella, C., & Horowitz, S. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. National Center for Learning Disabilities.
Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Prentice Hall.
de Verdier, K., Fernell, E., & Ek, U. (2017). Challenges and successful pedagogical strategies: Experiences from six Swedish students with blindness and autism in different school settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(2), 520-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3360-5
Díaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela-Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Investigación en Educación Médica, 2(7), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(13)72706-6
Douglas, G., Travers, J., McLinden, M., Robertson, C., Smith, E., Macnab, N., Powers, S., Guldberg, K., McGough, A., O’Donnell, M., & Lacey, P. (2012). Measuring educational engagement, progress and outcomes for children with special educational needs: A review. National Council for Special Education. https://bit.ly/3p9L307
Engels, M., Spilt, J., Denies, K., & Verschueren, K. (2021). The role of affective teacher-student relationships in adolescents’ school engagement and achievement trajectories. Learning and Instruction, 75. https://doi.org/gjqmsg
Erentaitė, R., Vosylis, R., Gabrialavičiūtė, I. & Raižienė, S. (2018). How does school experience relate to adolescent identity formation over time? Cross-lagged associations between school engagement, school burnout and identity processing styles. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(4), 760-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0806-1
Espinoza, O., González, E., Castillo, D., & Neut, S. (2019). Condicionantes de la retención estudiantil en escuelas de segunda oportunidad en Chile. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Niñez y Juventud, 17(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.11600/1692715x.17201
Ewe, L. (2019). ADHD symptoms and the teacher–student relationship: A systematic literature review. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 24(2), 136-155. https://doi.org/gh8hf9
Flick, U. (2004). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Morata.
Forlin, C., & Chambers, D. (2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866x.2010.540850
Fredricks, J. (2015). Academic engagement. En J. Wright (Ed.), The International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 31-36). Elsevier. https://doi.org/g6sw
Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307400105
Fredricks, J., Parr, A. K., Amemiya, J. L., Wang, M. T., & Brauer, S. (2019). What matters for urban adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(5), 491-527. https://doi.org/gfv79j
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill.
Kiefer, S. M., Alley, K. M., & Ellerbrock, C. R. (2015). Teacher and peer support for young adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and school belonging. RMLE Online, 38(8), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2015.11641184
Li, Y., & Learner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021307
Maxwell, J. A. (2019). Diseño de investigación cualitativa. Gedisa.
Moreira, P., Bilimória, H., Pedrosa, C., Pires, M., Cepa, M., & Mestre, M. (2015). Engagement with school students with special educational needs. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 15(3), 361-375.
Moreira, P., Dias, P., Vaz, F. M., & Vaz, J. M. (2013). Predictors of academic performance and school engagement-Integrating persistence, motivation and study skills perspecti-ves using person-centered and variable-centered approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.016
Nakkura, M. (2020). Identity and possibility: Adolescent development and the potential of schools. En M. Sadowski (Ed.), Adolescents at school: Perspectives on youth, identity, and education (pp.11-22). Harvard Education Press.
O’Donnell, K., & Reschly, A. (2020). Student engagement and learning: Attention, behavioral, and emotional difficulties in School. En A. J. Martin, R. A. Sperling, & K. J. Newton (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology and students with special needs (pp.557-583). Routledge.
Pérez-Salas, C. P., Parra, V., Sáez-Delgado, F., & Olivares, H. (2021). Influence of teacher-student relationships and special educational needs on student engagement and disengagement: A correlational study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/g6sx
Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher-student relation-ships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345-387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434
Ramos-Díaz, E., Rodríguez-Fernández, A., Fernández-Zabala, A., Revuelta, L. & Zuazagoitia, A. (2016). Apoyo social percibido, autoconcepto e implicación escolar de estudiantes adolescentes. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 21(2), 339-356. https://doi.org/g6s2
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engage-ment by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:moem.0000032312.95499.6f
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R. A. A., Curby, T. W., & Abry, T. (2016). To what extent do teacher-student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning? Journal of Educational Psycho-logy, 107, 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037252
Rogers, M., Bélanger-Lejars, V., Toste, J. R., & Heath, N. L. (2015). Mismatched: ADHD symptomatology and the teacher–student relationship. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 20(4), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2014.972039
Roorda, D., Koomen, H., Spilt, J., & Oort, F. (2011). The in#uence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Schindler, B. (2018). Student engagement in inclusive classrooms. Education Economics, 26(3), 266-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1426733
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement as an organizational construct in the dynamics of motivational development. En K. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 223-245). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. Springer.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. En Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Sage.
Wang, M., Brinkworth, M., & Eccles, J. (2013). Moderating effects of teacher-student relationship in adolescent trajectories of emotional and behavioral adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 49(4), 690-705. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027916
Wang, M., & Eccles, J. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Develop-ment, 83(3), 877-895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x
Wang, M., & Eccles, J. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23. https://doi.org/bs4p
Wang, M., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722-737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138
Wang, M., Fredricks, J., Ye, F., Hofkens, T., & Linn, J. S. (2019). Conceptualization and Assessment of Adolescents’ Engagement and Disengagement in School: A Multidimensional School Engagement Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 592-606. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000431
Wang, M., Willett, J., & Eccles, J. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.001