Relação professor-aluno e compromisso escolar: percepção de jovens com necessidades educacionais especiais
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
(analítico)
Pesquisas anteriores afirmam que a relação professor-aluno é um fator relevante para o engajamento e desempenho acadêmico. No entanto, seu impacto tem sido pouco explorado em alunos com necessidades educacionais especiais. Este estudo examina a influência da relação professor aluno no compromisso escolar segundo a percepção dos alunos com alunos com necessidades educacionais especiais do primeiro ano do ensino médio, da Chile. O desenho foi qualitativo, fenomenológico, descritivo-analítico em escopo. Foram realizadas 10 entrevistas em profundidade com alunos com necessidades educacionais especiais. Os dados foram analisados segundo as diretrizes metodológicas da teoria fundamentada nos dados. Os resultados apontam para o papel fundamental do professor no comprometimento escolar, por meio da satisfação das necessidades de vinculação e competência de seus alunos, mas não de sua autonomia.
Palavras-chave: Compromisso escolar, necessidades educacionais especiais, relação professor-aluno, estudantes do ensino médio.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Você tem o direito de:
- Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato
- Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material
- O licenciante não pode revogar estes direitos desde que você respeite os termos da licença.
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
-
Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
-
NãoComercial — Você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais.
-
CompartilhaIgual — Se você remixar, transformar, ou criar a partir do material, tem de distribuir as suas contribuições sob a mesma licença que o original.
- Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.
Referências
Alley, K. M. (2019). Fostering middle school students’ autonomy to support motivation and engagement. Middle School Journal, 50(3), 5-14. https://doi.org/g6ss
Archambault, I., Vandenbossche-Makombo, J. & Fraser, S. L. (2017). Students’ oppositional behaviors and engagement in school: The differential role of the student-teacher relationship. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(6), 1702-1712. https://doi.org/f99fz8
Ben-Yehuda, S., Leyser, Y., & Last, U. (2009). Teacher educational beliefs and sociometric status of special educational needs (SEN) students in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/btszv7
Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., & Webster, R. (2009). The effect of support staff on pupil engagement and individual attention. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 661-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902878917
Burns, E., Martin, A., & Collie, R. (2018). Adaptability, personal best (PB) goals setting, and gains in students’ academic outcomes: A longitudinal examination from a social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.02.001
Canales, M. (2006). Metodologías de investigación social. LOM.
Carter, E., Sisco, L., Brown, L., Brickham, D., & Al-Khabbaz, Z. (2008). Peer interactions and academic engagement of youth with developmental disabilities in inclusive middle and high school classrooms. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113(6), 479-494. https://doi.org/10.1352/2008.113:479-494
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.), (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. En M. Gunnar, & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology (pp. 43-77). The University of Chicago.
Cortiella, C., & Horowitz, S. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. National Center for Learning Disabilities.
Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Prentice Hall.
de Verdier, K., Fernell, E., & Ek, U. (2017). Challenges and successful pedagogical strategies: Experiences from six Swedish students with blindness and autism in different school settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(2), 520-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3360-5
Díaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela-Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Investigación en Educación Médica, 2(7), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(13)72706-6
Douglas, G., Travers, J., McLinden, M., Robertson, C., Smith, E., Macnab, N., Powers, S., Guldberg, K., McGough, A., O’Donnell, M., & Lacey, P. (2012). Measuring educational engagement, progress and outcomes for children with special educational needs: A review. National Council for Special Education. https://bit.ly/3p9L307
Engels, M., Spilt, J., Denies, K., & Verschueren, K. (2021). The role of affective teacher-student relationships in adolescents’ school engagement and achievement trajectories. Learning and Instruction, 75. https://doi.org/gjqmsg
Erentaitė, R., Vosylis, R., Gabrialavičiūtė, I. & Raižienė, S. (2018). How does school experience relate to adolescent identity formation over time? Cross-lagged associations between school engagement, school burnout and identity processing styles. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(4), 760-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0806-1
Espinoza, O., González, E., Castillo, D., & Neut, S. (2019). Condicionantes de la retención estudiantil en escuelas de segunda oportunidad en Chile. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Niñez y Juventud, 17(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.11600/1692715x.17201
Ewe, L. (2019). ADHD symptoms and the teacher–student relationship: A systematic literature review. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 24(2), 136-155. https://doi.org/gh8hf9
Flick, U. (2004). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Morata.
Forlin, C., & Chambers, D. (2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866x.2010.540850
Fredricks, J. (2015). Academic engagement. En J. Wright (Ed.), The International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 31-36). Elsevier. https://doi.org/g6sw
Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307400105
Fredricks, J., Parr, A. K., Amemiya, J. L., Wang, M. T., & Brauer, S. (2019). What matters for urban adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(5), 491-527. https://doi.org/gfv79j
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill.
Kiefer, S. M., Alley, K. M., & Ellerbrock, C. R. (2015). Teacher and peer support for young adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and school belonging. RMLE Online, 38(8), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2015.11641184
Li, Y., & Learner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021307
Maxwell, J. A. (2019). Diseño de investigación cualitativa. Gedisa.
Moreira, P., Bilimória, H., Pedrosa, C., Pires, M., Cepa, M., & Mestre, M. (2015). Engagement with school students with special educational needs. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 15(3), 361-375.
Moreira, P., Dias, P., Vaz, F. M., & Vaz, J. M. (2013). Predictors of academic performance and school engagement-Integrating persistence, motivation and study skills perspecti-ves using person-centered and variable-centered approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.016
Nakkura, M. (2020). Identity and possibility: Adolescent development and the potential of schools. En M. Sadowski (Ed.), Adolescents at school: Perspectives on youth, identity, and education (pp.11-22). Harvard Education Press.
O’Donnell, K., & Reschly, A. (2020). Student engagement and learning: Attention, behavioral, and emotional difficulties in School. En A. J. Martin, R. A. Sperling, & K. J. Newton (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology and students with special needs (pp.557-583). Routledge.
Pérez-Salas, C. P., Parra, V., Sáez-Delgado, F., & Olivares, H. (2021). Influence of teacher-student relationships and special educational needs on student engagement and disengagement: A correlational study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/g6sx
Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher-student relation-ships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345-387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434
Ramos-Díaz, E., Rodríguez-Fernández, A., Fernández-Zabala, A., Revuelta, L. & Zuazagoitia, A. (2016). Apoyo social percibido, autoconcepto e implicación escolar de estudiantes adolescentes. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 21(2), 339-356. https://doi.org/g6s2
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engage-ment by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:moem.0000032312.95499.6f
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R. A. A., Curby, T. W., & Abry, T. (2016). To what extent do teacher-student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning? Journal of Educational Psycho-logy, 107, 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037252
Rogers, M., Bélanger-Lejars, V., Toste, J. R., & Heath, N. L. (2015). Mismatched: ADHD symptomatology and the teacher–student relationship. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 20(4), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2014.972039
Roorda, D., Koomen, H., Spilt, J., & Oort, F. (2011). The in#uence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Schindler, B. (2018). Student engagement in inclusive classrooms. Education Economics, 26(3), 266-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1426733
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement as an organizational construct in the dynamics of motivational development. En K. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 223-245). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. Springer.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. En Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Sage.
Wang, M., Brinkworth, M., & Eccles, J. (2013). Moderating effects of teacher-student relationship in adolescent trajectories of emotional and behavioral adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 49(4), 690-705. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027916
Wang, M., & Eccles, J. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Develop-ment, 83(3), 877-895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x
Wang, M., & Eccles, J. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23. https://doi.org/bs4p
Wang, M., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722-737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138
Wang, M., Fredricks, J., Ye, F., Hofkens, T., & Linn, J. S. (2019). Conceptualization and Assessment of Adolescents’ Engagement and Disengagement in School: A Multidimensional School Engagement Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 592-606. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000431
Wang, M., Willett, J., & Eccles, J. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.001