Theoretical study on the use of the landscape concept in archaeological research
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The landscape study in archaeology presumes the use of differentiated categories in different knowledge areas, having as focus the comprehension of the existing relations between humans and yours environments. This paper has as preoccupation presents the different paradigms in which the landscape concept has been used in archaeology, of the same way it has been enabling the enlargement of archaeological site notion. It is known that humans walking through the environments in which they live, in which perceptions and concepts are established by means of the cognitive processes and, consequently, cultural processes. In this case the landscape is comprehended as a social construction, having like theoretical base the concepts of établissement (settlement) by Mauss; Place by Binford and Persistent Places by Schlanger.
Key words: Landscape, Settlement, Place, Persistent Places.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial - You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
ShareAlike - If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Binford, L. R. (1982). The Archaeology of Place. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 01, pp. 05-31.
Binford, L. R. (1992). Seeing the present and interpreting the past - and keeping things straight. In: Rossignol, J. & Wandsnider, L. Space, Time and Archaeological Landscapes, (pp. 43-59). New York: Plenum.
Binford, L. R. (2001). Constructing Frames of Reference - an analytical method for archaeological theory building using hunter-gatherer and environmental data sets. Berkley: University of California Press.
Criado Boado, F. (1991).Construcción social del espacio y reconstrucción arqueológica del paisaje. Boletín de Antropología Americana, 24, pp. 5-29.
Dunell, R. C. (2007). Classificação em Arqueologia. São Paulo: Edusp.
Geertz, C. (1989). A Interpretação das Culturas. Rio de Janeiro: LTC Editora.
Geertz, C. (2001). O Saber Local. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes.
Hegmon, M. (2003). Setting theoretical egos aside: issues and theory in North American Archaeology. American Antiquity, 68 (02), pp. 213-243.
Hitchcock, R. K. & Bartram, L. E. (1998). Social boundaries, technical system, and the use of space and technology in the Kalahari. In: Stark, M. The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 12- 49.
Hodder, I. (1986). Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
Hodder, I. (1987). Converging traditions: the search for symbolic meanings in archaeology and geography. In: Wagstafe, J. M. (ed.) Landscape of Culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. New York: Basil/ Blackwell.
Johnsen, H. & Olsen, B. (1992). Hermeneutics and Archaeology: on the philosophy of contextual archaeology. American Antiquity, 57 (03), pp. 419-436.
Latour, B. (1994). Jamais fomos modernos: ensaio de Antropologia Simétrica. São Paulo: Editora 34.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (2008). O Pensamento Selvagem. 9a ed. Campinas: Papirus.
Mauss, M. (1974a). Ensaio sobre as variações sazoneiras das sociedades esquimó. In: Sociologia e Antropologia, (pp. 237-331). São Paulo: Edusp.
Mauss, M. (1974b). Ensaio sobre a Dádiva: forma e razão da troca nas sociedades arcaicas. In: Sociologia e Antropologia, (pp. 37-184). São Paulo: Edusp.
Morais, J. L. de (2000). Tópicos da Arqueologia da Paisagem. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia da Universidade de São Paulo, MAE/ USP, 10, pp. 03-30.
Morais, J. L. de (2006). Reflexões acerca da Arqueologia Preventiva. In: Mori, Souza, Bastos & Gallo (org.) Patrimônio: atualizando o debate, (pp. 191- 220). Brasília: Iphan.
Schiffer, M. B. (1972). Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity, 37 (2), pp. 156-165.
Schlanger, S. (1992). Recognizing Persistent Places in Anasazi Settlement Systems. In: Rossignol & Wandsnider. Space, Time, and Archaeological Landscapes, (pp. 91-112). New York and London: Plenum Press.
Silva-Mendes, G. L. (2007). Caçadores coletores na serra de Paranapiacaba durante a transição do Holoceno médio para o tardio (5920 a 1000 anos A.P.). 503f, 2v. Dissertação (Mestrado em Arqueologia). Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia da Universidade de São Paulo, MAE/USP, 2007.