Psychoanalysis and politics. Pathologization of the poor childhood in Argentina
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this article I analyze different approaches that, from diverse fields are aimed to take action in connection with poor childhood. In Argentina, among the most outstanding narratives, psychoanalysis is the one that stands out from the rest; after its success in clinical practice, it continues showing vocation towards the long- suffering and excluded childhood.
However, psychoanalytic interventions (in the slums, at school, etc.) frequently seem to psychologyze the conflict and the social drama. The political efficiency of psychoanalysis has been also questioned by the new philosophical pragmatism which distrusts the public utility of psychoanalysis. The analysis is closed by a theoretical debate about this huge controversial issue that brings deconstruction theoreticians and the American philosopher, Richard Rorty, face to face, in order to finally retake Lacan's reflections on psychoanalysis and politics.
Key words: Psychoanalysis, politics, childhood, poverty, pathologization, Deconstruction, Pragmatism.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial - You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
ShareAlike - If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Ãlvarez, A. R. (2003). No ignorancia de la necesidad. Reunión Lacanoamericana de Psicoanálisis. Tucumán, octubre 2003. Mimeo.
Baudrillard, J. (1978). Cultura y simulacro. Barcelona: Kairós.
Bauman, S. (2004) Identidad. Buenos Aires: Losada.
De la Vega, E. (2008). Las trampas de la escuela integradora. La intervención posible. Buenos Aires: Noveduc.
Derrida, J. (1992). Force of law: the 'Mystical foundation of authority'. En Corrnell, D., Rosenfeld, M. & Gray Carlson, D. (Comp.) Descontrution and the possibility of justice. Nueva York & Londres: Routledge.
Derrida, J. (2005). Notas sobre deconstrucción y pragmatismo. En Deconstrucción y pragmatismo. Buenos Aires: 2005.
Duschatzky, S. & Corea, C. (2004). Chicos en banda. Los caminos de la subjetividad en el declive de las instituciones. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Unicef (2006). Excluidos e invisibles. Estado Mundial de la Infancia. New York: Unicef.
Lacan, J. (1981). Seminario 20. Aun. 1972 - 1973. Barcelona: Paidós.
Lacan, J. (1984). El seminario. Libro 2. El yo en la teoría de Freud y en la técnica psicoanalítica. 1954 - 1955. Barcelona: Paidós.
Laclau, E. (2005). Deconstrucción, pragmatismo, hegemonía. En Deconstrucción y pragmatismo. Buenos Aires: 2005.
Massumi, B. (2002). Navigating Movements. Nueva York: Routledge.
Mouffe, Ch. (2005). Comp. Deconstrucción y pragmatismo. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Spivak, G. Ch. (1995). En D., Mahasweta. (Introducción) Imaginary maps. Londres/Nueva York: Routledge.
Stefan, J. (2008). Escuela, violencia y niños en situación de calle. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad de Buenos Aires.