Criterios para el análisis y evaluación de casos en la educación moral
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
(descriptive): The central objective of the article is to propose different criteria for the analysis and evaluation of cases in moral education. The article proposes four criteria: 1) the identification of moral dilemmas that are identified in the narration of the case; 2) the analysis of facts and circumstances; 3) argumentative consistency and 4) the moral justification of the alternatives for moral decisions that students identify. These criteria serve to guide pedagogical processes in the classroom through cases with dilemmas that strengthen the development of students' moral judgment. Teachers can adopt these criteria for use in their classrooms and to evaluate the performance of their students. The proposed criteria can be implemented in both secondary and higher education.
Key words: Ethics, method of teaching, case studies, moral education, moral development, moral dilemmas (Thesaurus Unesco).
Article Details
You are free to:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial - You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
ShareAlike - If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.