A pragmatic approach to the moral judgment theory, from the critique to Kohlberg
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims at presenting a critique to Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development from a pragmatic perspective. Two complementary theories that make up an alternative position to Kohlberg's deontological perspective are taken into account. On one hand, Krebs and Danton's work on moral development, which conceives it from the way people resolve their daily life moral dilemmas, thus opting for meeting their goals in the framework of some cooperation relationships. On the other hand, the Theory on Expertise proposed by the Dreyfus brothers, where human beings do not refer to daily life principles to face dilemmatic moral situations, but they just lean on the knowledge about a great number of examples accumulated from experience and which are useful to define a given course of action.
Keywords: moral development, cooperation, expertise
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial - You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
ShareAlike - If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.